{"id":1128,"date":"2014-05-31T12:49:36","date_gmt":"2014-05-31T06:49:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/oicd.net\/_new\/?p=1128"},"modified":"2017-06-20T20:48:19","modified_gmt":"2017-06-20T14:48:19","slug":"expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/","title":{"rendered":"Expatriate and \u2018Local Hire\u2019 Japanese in Hong Kong and the Struggle for the Soul of Japan"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ayako Sone and Gordon Mathews<\/em><\/p>\n

This article is based on research conducted by Ayako Sone in 2001-2002 on the cultural identities of Japanese in Hong Kong; but it places that research into a broader perspective. \u00a0We discuss the conflict between \u201cJapanese\u201d and \u201cnon-Japanese\u201d among Japanese in Hong Kong: the conflict between expatriates and local hires\u2014between, we argue, those who represent the postwar Japanese social order and those who have rejected that order, a conflict that we maintain has much to say about not just Japanese in Hong Kong but about the changing definition of Japaneseness. \u00a0In an increasingly globalized world, Japan is no longer confined to Japan, but plays out on a global stage (Befu and Guichard-Anguis 2001). At the same time, many Japanese, even those who live overseas, continue to try to keep the world beyond Japan at arm\u2019s length. \u00a0It has long been noted that many of those Japanese who are discontented with Japanese life leave Japan and its social pressures to live overseas, where they can lead freer lives. \u00a0What has also been the case, however, is that many of those Japanese who are deeply committed to the conventional structures of Japanese life are also leaving Japan, sent by their companies to maintain their companies\u2019 profits overseas: the latter group may employ members of the former group as cultural brokers between Japan and their foreign locale, but despite their common ethnicity and citizenship, conflict often arises, conflict that can teach us much about the nature of Japan today and tomorrow. \u00a0In the first part of this article, we examine the gap in Hong Kong between these different types of Japanese. \u00a0In the second part of the article, we consider the gap in Japan between the two groups exemplified in Hong Kong: the conflict between the young, the female, and the foreign as against the old, the male, and the domestic, a conflict that we see as one for the soul of Japan.<\/p>\n

\u201cJapanese\u201d and \u201cNon-Japanese\u201d Among Japanese in Hong Kong<\/strong><\/p>\n

There are some 14,000 Japanese living in Hong Kong, according to the official figures of the Hong Kong Immigration Department (Fraser 2003); the Consulate General of Japan estimated almost 23,000 in 2001 (Sone 2002: 2). \u00a0Workers within this total are divided occupationally into two distinct groups. \u00a0There are the ch\u016bzaiin, those who were hired by a company in Japan, and sent to Hong Kong. There are also the genchi-say\u014d, \u201clocal hires\u201d: Japanese who came to Hong Kong of their own accord, without being sent by Japanese companies, and were hired in Hong Kong by Japanese or by other countries\u2019 companies. This distinction between ch\u016bzaiin and genchi-saiy\u014d–between expatriates and local hires, as we will hereafter call them–is not simply analytical but is known by virtually all working Japanese in Hong Kong as a crucial divide. \u00a0In this paper we argue that the conflict between expatriates and local hires in Hong Kong is fundamentally a conflict over the future of what it means to be Japanese.<\/p>\n

Sone is by no means the first researcher to discuss the distinction between expatriates and local hires among Japanese overseas. \u00a0A number of scholars–Sakai, discussing Japanese workers in London (2000) and Ben-Ari and Yong discussing Japanese workers in Singapore (2000) have also explored this distinction. \u00a0Ben-Ari and Yong characterize single Japanese female locally-hired workers in Singapore as \u201ctwice marginalized\u201d: from, on the one hand, the Japan they had fled and the Japanese expatriate community in Singapore, and on the other hand from Singapore, which most cannot fully culturally enter (2000: 82). Their lack of language skill, as well as their different cultural background, blocks them from full entry into Singaporean life, just as their departure from Japan may make it difficult for them to \u201cgo home again,\u201d Ben Ari and Yong argue. Similarly, Sakai analyzes locally-hired Japanese female employees in London as betwixt and between the Japan they have left and the host culture, which, even if they marry British husbands, many feel that they cannot ever fully enter (2000: 214-239). \u00a0Wong also briefly discusses the situation of locally-hired female workers, in his analysis of a Japanese supermarket in Hong Kong (1999: 146-156). \u00a0Sone\u2019s research builds off this earlier research, but differs in that it focuses not simply on local hires and their views of the world, but on the conflict between local hires and expatriates, as revealed through their interactions. \u00a0This tension has implications transcending these particular groups. \u00a0In this paper, we will first briefly describe these two groups, then discuss their interactions, and finally explore how the conflict between these two groups echoes throughout Japanese society in Hong Kong and in Japan.<\/p>\n

Japanese expatriates are those who have been sent by corporate headquarters in Japan to Hong Kong, often along with their families, for a definite, limited period. They enjoy numerous benefits because of their Japanese corporate membership, but also have little control over the length of their stay in Hong Kong, being at their company\u2019s beck and call. \u00a0They themselves generally have no particular interest in Hong Kong; they tend to see local Hong Kong employees, as well as Japanese locally-hired employees, primarily in terms of the benefit they can bring their home company. \u00a0Their point of reference, the axis upon which their world revolves, is their company headquarters in Tokyo. There are, of course, considerable variations among members of this group, with a few forming friendships with local Hong Kong people as well as with locally hired Japanese in ways that transcend the workplace and business. \u00a0But by and large, members of this group have little interaction with Hong Kong and with life in Hong Kong, a result both of language limitation (many speak only Japanese) and attitude. \u00a0Befu has written that \u201csome of the worst culprits of\u2026ethnocentrism are [Japanese] business expatriates stationed abroad, who readily disparage locals for everything that is not like Japan\u2026.Whatever is not Japanese-like in the local culture is the reason for the economic backwardness of the country of assignment\u201d (Befu 2001: 68). \u00a0This certainly characterizes some, although by no means all, of the expatriates Sone interviewed.<\/p>\n

By contrast, Genchi-saiy\u014d, the Japanese locally hired in Hong Kong, have comparative freedom, in that they themselves decide the length of their stay in Hong Kong. \u00a0Their salary and benefits, however, are almost always far lower than those of Japanese expatriates, and they may also be socially discriminated against in various ways by those expatriates. \u00a0Most often, they are young women in their late twenties and thirties who have opted out of life in Japan, at least temporarily, to go and live and work overseas. \u00a0There are a wide variety of local hires, with some, at one extreme, opting on a brief overseas adventure before returning to Japan and taking on conventional Japanese lives, and others, at the other extreme, marrying Hongkongers and leaving Japan behind, to \u201cgo native,\u201d perhaps for the duration of their lives. \u00a0There is also a great difference in cultural and linguistic proficiency among them, with some largely confined to Japanese in their social and professional interactions, and others wholly fluent in both English and Cantonese. \u00a0Despite these differences, their role, if hired by Japanese companies (as most of them are), is largely to serve as an intermediary between Japanese expatriates (both within the company and corporate clients) and local Hong Kong employees, as well as an aid to expatriates in settling in Hong Kong. \u00a0In one local hire\u2019s words (Sone 2002: 60): \u201cI have to act as a mediator between Japanese clients and Hong Kong Chinese staff\u2026.It\u2019s the\u2026raison d\u2019etre of Japanese like me in Hong Kong.\u201d \u00a0However, this role may be fraught with ambiguity, an ambiguity played out both in local hires\u2019 own perceptions of their lives, and in their interactions with expatriates.<\/p>\n

For example, in interactions between the two, expatriates may wonder if they can trust local hires and local hires may strive to demonstrate that they can indeed be trusted as Japanese. \u00a0In one local hire\u2019s words (Sone 2002: 64):<\/p>\n

When I meet my Japanese client, and he comes to know that I\u2019m a local hire who can speak Cantonese, he becomes alert, because he thinks I\u2019m pro-Hong Kong and anti-Japan. \u00a0I can feel it. \u00a0He seems to choose the topic of our conversation very carefully. \u00a0But if I say to him something like, \u201cDon\u2019t you think that Hong Kong people are noisy and have bad manners?\u201d the tension is relieved\u2026<\/p>\n

This man is not typical among local hires, in that he speaks fluent Cantonese; but his expression is important, in indicating how, in Hong Kong, Japanese who interact with Hong Kong people too closely may be seen as suspect. \u00a0As the above words indicate, local hires may be seen as having questionable Japanese cultural loyalty, and thus must demonstrate their loyalty to expatriates.<\/p>\n

Indeed, we may go so far as to say that instead of a simple binary division between Japanese and Hong Kong Chinese, a tripartite division is more apt: at one pole, expatriates as Japanese, at the other pole Hong Kong Chinese, and local hires in the middle, between these groups, neither one nor the other. \u00a0Expatriates are seen as both ethnically and culturally Japanese; Hong Kong Chinese are, of course, seen as neither ethnically nor culturally Japanese. \u00a0Local hires are seen as ethnically Japanese but culturally suspect. \u00a0Unlike the expatriates, who are \u201cJapanese\u201d Japanese, the local hires may be characterized, more or less, as \u201cnon-Japanese\u201d Japanese. \u00a0This is implied in the following statement by a local hire, discussing her ignorance of her Japanese company\u2019s year-end party in Hong Kong (Sone 2002: 38): \u201cYes, I guess my company holds a year-end party. \u00a0But I don\u2019t know, because I don\u2019t get any notice. \u00a0I think the Japanese circulate e-mail among themselves [Nihonjin doshi de meiru mawashite iru\u2019n ja nai kana].\u201d \u00a0For this locally-hired employee, the term \u201cJapanese\u201d refers only to Japanese expatriates; she herself, as a local hire, has somehow become exempt from the category \u201cJapanese,\u201d no longer designating herself as such, at least in the context of her company. \u00a0Her linguistic usage was somewhat idiosyncratic, but does reflect a dominant view among local hires: unlike expatriates, they are not seen as full-fledged Japanese in Hong Kong.<\/p>\n

This difference between \u201cJapanese\u201d and \u201cnon-Japanese\u201d is very much linked to gender, and gender relations. \u00a0Expatriates are generally men, often middle-aged; local hires are often women, much younger; and there may be a profound tension between the two. \u00a0As one young woman reported:<\/p>\n

In a foreign country, what is most troublesome is dealing with Japanese men. \u00a0It\u2019s the hardest part of overseas life\u2026.I still remember a locally-hired girl being asked by a Japanese expatriate, \u201cYou came here alone to Hong Kong to fool around with men, didn\u2019t you?\u201d [D\u014dse onna hitori de kite koko de charachara yatte iru\u2019n desh\u014d], whereupon he tried to molest her\u2026.After I heard this story, I realized how I am looked at\u2026.Japanese expatriates seem to think, \u201cThis locally-hired girl hasn\u2019t been brought up in a good family, and that\u2019s why she has regressed as far as Hong Kong\u2026.She must be very loose\u2026\u201d \u00a0\u00a0(Sone 2002: 70-71)<\/p>\n

There are several interesting themes in her words. \u00a0There is first the implicit male assumption that (in somewhat overstated terms), \u201cJapan is morally pure, the land of chaste, virtuous women; morally impure women leave Japan to flaunt their depravity overseas, in places like Hong Kong.\u201d \u00a0Aside from all the obvious sexist implications of this assumption, it ignores the fact that Hong Kong is in general more sexually conservative than Japan. If a young woman were to seek to \u201cfool around with men,\u201d Tokyo would seem to offer better prospects than Hong Kong. \u00a0Beyond this, there is the Morganian and Tylorean assumption in this statement (see Langness 1987: 30-36) of an evolutionary ladder: \u201cregressed as far as Hong Kong\u201d seems to mean that one has descended the ladder of cultural advancement from Japan to Hong Kong\u2014left the heights of Japanese modernity to enter a lower and less civilized Chinese realm. \u00a0This view of course reflects the complex history of China vis-\u00e0-vis Japan: China as the master now debauched, surpassed by her pupil. \u00a0This view ignores the cultural particularities of Hong Kong, as a society more open to the world\u2019s influences, and more capitalistic and more transnational than Japan.<\/p>\n

It is, however, notable that many of the locally hired women seem to see the relation of Japan to Hong Kong in exactly opposite terms; many women Sone interviewed said that if they were men, they would not have quit their jobs in Japan and come to Hong Kong, because if they were men, their companies would have appreciated their ability more, and they would not have been frustrated by their treatment from male colleagues. \u00a0Hong Kong, in many young Japanese women\u2019s eyes, is seen as a gender-equal and meritocratic society where women can pursue their careers more equally and more aggressively than in Japan. \u00a0As one young Japanese woman told Mathews, \u201cHong Kong is more advanced than Japan is, because in Hong Kong women and men can work equally, with equal compensation; that\u2019s not yet true in Japan. \u00a0Hong Kong is modern, but Japan is still backward when it comes to gender relations.\u201d \u00a0This view reverses the evolutionary ladder that may be assumed by expatriates such as the man depicted above; it is, in this view, Hong Kong that is modern, because it does not repress women in their talents, as does what they see as the more chauvinistic, even feudalistic, Japan.<\/p>\n

The gender issue was generally obscured by the expatriates Sone spoke with, who seemed often to focus instead on \u201crace\u201d as the crucial marker of difference between Hong Kong and Japan. \u00a0In one Japanese manager\u2019s words, reflecting the words of a number of others as well, \u201cThe Hong Kong Chinese work ethic is quite different from our Japanese work ethic. \u00a0We would give them the same status as we have if they could have loyalty towards the company. \u00a0But they can\u2019t. \u00a0We are racially different\u2026\u201d (Sone 2002: 46). \u00a0\u00a0The term \u201crace\u201d in comments such as these is ambiguous; while some of these expatriates seem to use it to refer to fixed biological differences, (a usage which is obviously incorrect), others seem to refer by \u201crace\u201d to cultural differences, which undoubtedly exist\u2014there are indeed complex cultural differences in attitudes towards work between many Japanese and many Hong Kong Chinese. \u00a0Nonetheless, the expatriate quoted above may confuse cause and effect when he claims that Hong Kong workers \u201cracially\u201d have no loyalty toward the company. \u00a0When there is a long-term reward for being loyal, as there has been for expatriates and for Japanese salarymen in general, who may be still more or less cocooned within \u201clifetime employment,\u201d then employees will by and large be loyal. \u00a0(This is giving way in Japan in recent years, as lifetime employment is increasingly being called into question, but it still largely remains among middle-aged employees such as these). \u00a0When there is no such long-term reward, as is the case for Hong Kong Chinese employees, then only a fool will be loyal beyond a certain point. \u00a0This is thus not a matter of \u201crace\u201d but of reward structure. \u00a0The local hires, again, are lodged ambiguously in the middle. They are \u201cracially\u201d Japanese, yet they are under the reward structure of Hong Kong Chinese, and thus it is hardly surprising that their \u201ccorporate loyalty\u201d too, as Japanese, may sometimes be called into question by expatriates.<\/p>\n

These local hires are often viewed, by both expatriates and by themselves, as \u201cfugitives from the Japanese system.\u201d \u00a0They may be seen by the more liberal expatriates as those who have left a Japanese system that is outmoded in the new world of today, a world of flexible accumulation in the global market. In this sense, they could be seen as representing Japan\u2019s future\u2014a wave of necessary change. \u00a0Many other expatriates, however, see them as \u201cculturally different\u201d if not \u201cracially different,\u201d in their conscious choice to forsake Japanese life to live overseas; indeed, they may even be seen as \u201ctraitors to Japan.\u201d \u00a0To many expatriates, the very fact that they encounter these women not in Japan but in Hong Kong, a foreign society that they have chosen to live in over Japan, makes them automatically suspect as to their cultural loyalty, as we have seen. In a Japan today that is suffering from a continuing crisis of confidence, these local hires, in their choice to forsake Japan at least temporarily, may evoke strong feelings in those who have not made such a choice. \u00a0These women themselves often agonize over their ultimate loyalty: will they return to Japan to work and live, or will they remain in Hong Kong perhaps marrying a Hong Kong man and leaving behind their Japanese lives? The questions as to loyalty that expatriates may ask of local hires are, in this sense, not unwarranted: where does their home and loyalty ultimately lie?<\/p>\n

However, the questions of loyalty asked by expatriates to local hires are not really about Japan and Japaneseness, in all the broad connotations of these terms, but rather about a postwar Japanese social order that is now crumbling. \u00a0The tension between expatriates and local hires is not a tension over whether these local hires are Japanese\u2014of course they are\u2014but whether they are part of \u201cthe \u2018Japanese\u2019 project\u201d: whether they are willing to base their lives on the premises of the postwar Japanese social order. \u00a0But what is this postwar Japanese social order, exactly? \u00a0We suggest that it contains at least the following fundamental premises, among others:<\/p>\n

1) men\u2019s primary role is at work, earning money for one\u2019s family; women\u2019s primary role is at home, raising children;<\/p>\n

2) age and seniority are markers of wisdom; lifetime employment and seniority-based pay and authority are a natural consequence of this;<\/p>\n

3) the world beyond Japan is not to be trusted; the Japanese individual must grow up and live within Japanese institutions in order to be fully trusted; and<\/p>\n

4) these parameters define a prescribed way of life, without much tolerance for the plurality of life patterns that may exist within various other contemporary societies.<\/p>\n

The expatriates we have considered live out these premises\u2014they may be stationed overseas at present, but the world of their daily lives and deepest ongoing commitment is Japan in its postwar cultural, social and institutional structures and configurations. \u00a0The local hires more or less reject these premises\u2014they make their lives in Hong Kong, forsaking Japanese institutions, except those of their Japanese workplaces, which they cannot reject since this is the best and perhaps only way they can earn their living in a foreign country. \u00a0Thus the tension between these groups is not at all surprising. \u00a0The conflict between local hires and expatriates in Hong Kong is in essence a conflict between the young, the female, and the foreign versus the old, the male, and the domestic\u2014a microcosm of the conflict apparent in Japan today, as we will now explore.<\/p>\n

\u201cJapanese\u201d and \u201cnon-Japanese\u201d among Japanese in Japan<\/strong><\/p>\n

The gap between Japanese expatriates and local hires that we have discussed in Hong Kong exists in many other cities as well. \u00a0It exists in London, as described by Sakai (2000: 222-227), and in Singapore as described by Ben-Ari and Yong (as one woman they interviewed said of her expatriate Japanese male colleagues: \u201cThey don\u2019t understand why I want to come to Singapore to work; why I can\u2019t be like the \u2018typical\u2019 Japanese woman in Japan\u2014stay in Japan, work for a few years, find a husband, get married, stay at home and be a housewife\u201d: 2000: 101); it no doubt exists in New York as well, and today, increasingly, in Shanghai, among many other large cities across the globe.<\/p>\n

This gap also clearly exists in Japan itself. \u00a0The conflict between expatriates and local hires is most directly a conflict between those Japanese who choose to leave Japan, (the local hires), and those who choose to stay within the Japanese social order, (the expatriates). \u00a0However, it is also a gender gap (the large majority of local hires are female; the large majority of expatriates are male: as we have seen, much of their conflict revolves around gender issues) and a generation gap. \u00a0The majority of local hires are in their twenties and early thirties; the majority of expatriates are in their late thirties, forties, and fifties. \u00a0The latter have \u201cbought into\u201d the Japanese mainstream way of life, while the former are at least temporarily outside that mainstream and may or may not return to it as they grow older. \u00a0Let us now briefly examine each of these conflicts.<\/p>\n

The struggle between the domestic and foreign in Japan has been discussed at length in the literature exploring foreign migrants and workers in Japan. \u00a0Most of this literature is clearly sympathetic to the plight of foreign migrants. Komai (2001: 156), for example, sees foreign migrants as \u201cpotential stimuli for reforming the closed-mindedness of Japanese people and the rigid systems of Japanese society.\u201d \u00a0However, equally clearly, many Japanese do not share this sympathy. \u00a0As Douglass and Roberts write, \u201cThe challenge for Japan is to decide whether the response to the increasing presence of foreign workers and families will be one of trying to marginalize these alternative expressions of social and cultural identity\u2026or one of creating the political and social atmosphere for a multicultural society to flower\u201d (2000: 5). \u00a0Such a society would presumably allow for a pluralism that Japan at present largely lacks in its institutions and attitudes, a pluralism that would not only welcome foreign laborers, but also encourage, rather than discourage, the kinds of lives that the Japanese local hires in Hong Kong have for the time being chosen to live.<\/p>\n

More directly applicable to the situation of Japanese local hires and expatriates in Hong Kong is the literature on Japanese \u201creturnees\u201d coming back to Japan after years lived abroad. \u00a0White asked of Japanese company workers and professionals who had lived overseas, \u201cCan they go home again?\u201d: \u201cReturnees may find themselves with permanently flawed identities\u201d (1988: 2). \u00a0She explains this in terms of the relational nature of Japanese group membership:<\/p>\n

Membership in a Japanese group is mandated not by a particular contract, behavior, or belief but by active presence and participation in the social network\u2026.There is no acceptable substitute for being there\u2026.When Japanese leave Japan, their membership is suspended. \u00a0Every year they are away, reentry as members of the group\u2026becomes more difficult. (1988: 105-106)<\/p>\n

This was certainly true in the 1970s and 1980s, when White did her research, and to a lesser extent, remains true today (see Ben-Ari 2003: 121). \u00a0But things may be changing: returnee children (kikokushijo) were pitied as outcasts in the 1970s but by the 1990s had come to be seen as a privileged elite (Goodman 2003); there has been a similar trend among Japanese who attended universities abroad (Mori 2004). \u00a0Before the mid-1980s, according to Mori, these Japanese were seen as unemployable by most Japanese companies; by the early 1990s, they were viewed by Japanese companies as \u201cfunctionally useful\u2026yet\u2026morally objectionable\u201d (2004: 162), necessary in an era of internationalization but suspect in that they were seen as having lost their Japaneseness by attending university overseas. \u00a0By the late 1990s, however, they had become more generally acceptable to many Japanese companies, who began to welcome them for their expertise and independence.<\/p>\n

The same trend seems to be the case for Japanese corporate returnees, such as the Hong Kong expatriates interviewed by Sone. \u00a0Unlike the Japanese expatriates interviewed by White twenty-five years ago, these corporate employees will probably not have a significant problem upon their return to Japan, at least if their Hong Kong stay has been limited in its length, since an overseas sojourn has become an accepted part of elite Japanese corporate employees\u2019 lives. \u00a0However, the local hires interviewed by Sone have a more uncertain prospect. They chose to leave Japan for an overseas stay of unlimited duration; they may learn \u2018unJapanese\u2019 patterns of gender equality in the workplace that may not bode well for them upon their return to Japan. \u00a0If these local hires go home relatively quickly, they may be able to fit back into Japanese life, perhaps becoming company workers or wives and mothers, fitting into the expected Japanese pattern; but the longer they stay in Hong Kong, the more indelibly Hong Kong will mark them as different from their Japanese compatriots. Because, as noted above, there is not yet much acceptance in Japan of a diversity of Japanese lifecourses, these people may indeed face the question, \u201cCan they go home again?\u201d \u00a0And yet, to the extent to which they do go back home, perhaps they can help expand the Japanese social imagination: perhaps they too can be fully accepted as Japanese despite their \u201coverseas contamination.\u201d<\/p>\n

The next conflict to be considered is that between men and women. \u00a0A huge amount has been written about Japanese gender roles and relations. \u00a0Some of that literature (Iwao 1993: 7, Mathews 1996: 101-102) indicates that many women, seeing the lives that their husbands lead in their companies, do not want to live such miserable lives themselves, preferring the relative independence of staying at home as full-time housewives instead. \u00a0However, within the company, women continue to be distinct second-class citizens. \u00a0Ogasawara, in her insightful ethnography of Japanese company life, analyzes \u201coffice ladies\u2019\u201d acts of resistance to their male bosses in considerable detail (1998: 114-138): \u201cnot taking the initiative\u201d; \u201cdeclining to do favors\u201d; \u201crefusing to work\u201d overtime; and \u201ctelling tales to the personnel department.\u201d \u00a0She sees this resistance as due to the fact that \u201coffice ladies\u201d can leave the company, as men, expected to support their families, cannot: \u201coffice ladies,\u201d unlike their male counterparts, remain corporate outsiders, comparatively powerless but also comparatively free. \u00a0Some of the young women Mathews has interviewed in Japan felt this strongly; in one women\u2019s words, \u201cLots of young men think about gender relations very much as my father\u2019s generation did\u2026.But none of the young women I know think that way.\u201d A young woman who worked for a finance company was scathing in her scorn for her male corporate elders: \u201cMany of the men who are senior to me here\u2026really have no common sense at all\u2026.They lack a basic foundation as human beings.\u201d \u00a0She attributes this to the fact that they were hired in the 1980s, during the \u201cbubble years\u201d of the Japanese economy, when \u201ccompanies hired anybody [any man] even those without any ability.\u201d Today, because of lifetime employment, they are entrenched above her, to her frustration.<\/p>\n

The young Japanese women interviewed by Sone very much fit within this pattern: despite their own potential abilities, they are automatically relegated to the status of \u201clocal hires,\u201d distinctly inferior to the expatriates in their power and salaries. \u00a0This is ironic, since many came to Hong Kong to escape Japanese gender distinctions in the workplace; nonetheless, they have indeed escaped those gender restrictions in their positions vis-\u00e0-vis their Hong Kong colleagues. \u00a0As local hires, they are treated more or less like their Hong Kong colleagues, both men and women, but all are in common under the authority of Japanese men. \u00a0\u00a0If these Japanese female local hires become linguistically proficient in Cantonese, they may be able to eventually leave Japan in their employment as well as in their society of residence; but as long as they are not linguistically proficient, they will probably remain within the Japanese employment orbit. \u00a0In this, they will join their female counterparts in the workforce in Japan, whether they themselves return to Japan or not. \u00a0It has sometimes been said that one reason for Japan\u2019s economic stagnation over the past fifteen years is its failure to fully utilize half its population, that female half which seems most flexible and open to the world beyond Japan. \u00a0What of the next fifteen years? \u00a0Again, the issue is one of the diversity of lifecourses: what will it take before gender is no longer a prime determinant of one\u2019s career position and possibilities in Japan? \u00a0This battle today is being waged primarily between younger women and older men, not in terms of collective action of any sort, but in terms of millions of individual decisions, such as those which led Sone\u2019s local hires to leave Japan\u2014only to be immersed in the old Japan once again in their work lives.<\/p>\n

This brings us to the third gap to be considered: the generation gap between young and old. \u00a0There has been a huge outpouring of books and magazine articles in Japan on the Japanese generation gap (see, to mention only a few particularly perceptive works, Kotani 1998 and Sakurai 1997; see, for a discussion in English, Mathews and White 2004). \u00a0Some of this literature is not fully convincing in its discussion of potential generational change because it deals with secondary school or university students, who may easily enough modify their behavior when they become adults; as Edwin Seidensticker once commented, when the current generation reaches forty, they\u2019ll \u201cact just like everyone else at forty\u201d (Tergeson 1990), as may be the case for many of today\u2019s rebellious young people just as much as in the past. \u00a0However, young people further along on the path to adulthood may have made decisions in their lives that they cannot easily go back upon: young men seeking not to live lives like their fathers, and young woman seeking not to live lives like their mothers, who have made decisions that will cause them, contra Seidensticker, to probably be living lives very different from their parents at age forty. Over a million (and perhaps as many as three million: Majima 2002: 16) young men and women in Japan today have become furiitaa, young people who cannot or will not enter career-track jobs, but who take temporary, non-career-track work instead. \u00a0Given Japanese employment structures, allowing young people a very brief window of opportunity for pursuing career-track employment, (Mathews 2004: 121-124), this step seems irrevocable: these young people probably never will be career-track employees, as were their fathers.<\/p>\n

We have seen the gap in understanding that exists been expatriates and local hires in Hong Kong, as fellow Japanese working side by side and yet in some sense living in different worlds. \u00a0Similarly, in many companies in Japan today, career-track workers labor side by side with furiitaa, yet do not understand or trust those part-time, temporary workers; as one career-track employee told Mathews in Tokyo in 2002, \u201cI work with furiitaa every day, but I really don\u2019t know what they\u2019re thinking about in their lives.\u201d \u00a0Furiitaa have expressed similar sentiments to me about the career-track employees they work with\u2014there is a gap in comprehension and in trust, based on the fact that sarariimen have bought into the system, whereas furiitaa\u2014whether from choice or necessity\u2014have not (Mathews 2004: 128-129). \u00a0The relation between expatriates and local hires in Hong Kong represents a playing out of this tension in a non-Japanese locale, but with a similar degree of mutual incomprehension. Although it is structurally not quite the same, the relationship between expatriates and local hires clearly parallels the relation between regular sarariimen and furiitaa in Japan.<\/p>\n

Career company workers and full-time housewives are the embodiment of \u201cJapan,\u201d the postwar Japanese social order. \u00a0Just as furiitaa threaten the idea of the career-track wage-earner, parasaito shinguru (\u201cparasite singles\u201d: Yamada 1999: young women and men in their twenties and thirties who do not marry but live at home with their parents instead: see Nakano 2004) threaten the idea of marriage and family, and the full-time housewife. \u00a0Furiitaa and parasaito shinguru represent a rejection of the postwar Japanese social order, even though they themselves may not recognize that fact. \u00a0The local hires interviewed by Sone also represent this rejection of the postwar Japanese social order, in their refusal to follow the conventional lifecourse of living for work or family in Japan. \u00a0Like furiitaa and parasaito shinguru, most are largely unconscious of being in rebellion against the postwar Japanese social order; yet this, in effect, is how they are proceeding in their lives. \u00a0The more Japanese young people who follow in their footsteps, and in the footsteps of all those Japanese who in one way or another resist entering the postwar Japanese social order, the more rapidly that order will crumble.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

In this paper, we have examined the conflict between Japanese expatriates and local hires in Hong Kong. \u00a0We have argued that the conflict between expatriates and local hires is a microcosm of the conflict in Japan between the upholders of the postwar Japanese social order and those who erode that order: between the old, male, and domestic as against the young, female, and foreign. \u00a0It is hardly surprising that this dispute is taking place beyond Japan as well as within Japan: as Japan becomes increasingly globalized, cultural conflicts within Japan extend beyond Japan, and yet at the same time, older ideologies of Japanese difference from the world beyond Japan continue to retain power. \u00a0One key ideology of \u201cJapan,\u201d as we\u2019ve seen, is that of Japan as pure and innocent, as opposed to the evils of the world beyond Japan. \u00a0Such ideology has been central to postwar Japan, but these local hires have transgressed this ideology.<\/p>\n

Japanese have always gone overseas, but it is new over the past several decades to leave Japan and then work alongside those who have, in effect, stayed in Japan, which is the state of local hires vis-\u00e0-vis expatriates. \u00a0In this sense the local hires are bringing the dispute over the future of Japan beyond Japan; but it is also true that, more directly that their counterparts in Japan, they are rejecting Japan for the world beyond\u2014although, as noted earlier, this rejection is only partial, since it is the old Japan that employs them. \u00a0Befu has written that \u201cone might entertain the hypothesis that Japanese society is able to retain its relatively conservative social structure and value system because the very people who suffer most from these institutions and could challenge them tend to leave\u201d (2000: 40). Today, however, it is both the inhabitants of the old Japan and those who reject the old Japan who meet again in places like Hong Kong, to play out their latent or overt antagonism on a world stage.<\/p>\n

And what will become of their struggle? \u00a0Earlier writers discussing the situation of overseas Japanese as local hires\u2014Ben-Ari and Yong discussing Singapore and Sakai discussing London\u2014tend to offer pessimistic findings: these people, they find, have more or less irrevocably left Japan and yet cannot fit in their new society (Sakai 2000: 215). They are \u201cbetwixt and between,\u201d rendered rootless, and largely unable to go home again. \u00a0Sone\u2019s findings, in conjunction with the changing nature of Japanese society, offer more room for optimism. \u00a0In a globalizing Japan, the gap between Japan and other societies may be lessening; the local hires interviewed by Sone, like Mori\u2019s (2004) college graduates and Goodman\u2019s (2003) schoolchildren, may find that they indeed can go home again, and be accepted.<\/p>\n

The postwar Japanese social order, as earlier described, left little room for multiple paths in life. \u00a0The challenges represented by part-time workers, by those who don\u2019t marry, and by those who go abroad, are in a sense calls for pluralism, for the acceptance of these variable life paths. \u00a0The more the numbers of these \u2018outsiders\u2019 swell, the more pluralism will have to become an accepted social reality in Japan. \u00a0The postwar Japanese social order has been antithetical to pluralism, since pluralism could only undermine it. The participants in the tensions between expatriates and local hires in Hong Kong, as described by Sone, might not recognize it; but ultimately their struggle is over the soul of a new Japan.<\/p>\n

There is indeed astonishing diversity in Japan as compared to thirty years ago. Sone\u2019s local hires in Hong Kong hardly existed thirty years ago; nor did furiitaa or parasaito shinguru, at least at no more than a tiny fraction of their current numbers. \u00a0However, although individuals may be changing, the institutional structures of Japan are more resistant. \u00a0Lifetime employment remains largely intact (Holzhausen 2000), although it is under pressure due to Japan\u2019s less-than-stellar economic performance in recent years; gender discrimination in the workplace remains pervasive, with women\u2019s ultimate place still viewed as the home in most Japanese offices (again, see Mori, this volume); sh\u016bshoku katsud\u014d (\u201clooking-for-career activity\u201d), the narrow period of just a few years in which young people can seek career-track employment remains intact, making the youthful trying out of different paths dangerous in its potential personal consequences; \u00a0and the examination system, through which young people are fed into universities and employment, remains largely intact, thereby continuing the necessity for obtaining one\u2019s education within Japan. \u00a0Japanese institutions are mutually supportive and interdependent\u2014if lifetime employment gives way, then women will probably gain a greater role in the workplace; if the examination system gives way, then a major structural basis of lifetime employment will collapse: these institutions support one another, and in a sense ensure one another\u2019s ongoing survival. The implicit goal of these interlocking institutions is that of creating a common \u201cJapaneseness\u201d: \u201cJapanese\u201d such as that of the expatriates described in this paper. \u00a0More and more young people, epitomized by this paper\u2019s local hires, are seceding from this \u201cJapaneseness.\u201d What will it take before the institutions creating this common \u201cJapaneseness\u201d give way before a greater diversity of institutions, accommodating a greater plurality of lives?<\/p>\n

This process of this giving way is already happening, year by year, but is being resisted, and for good reason: \u00a0if these interlocking institutions give way, replaced by a plurality of institutions supporting a diversity of life paths, then \u201cJapan\u201d will vanish. \u00a0That version of Japan has been based on an alternative version of capitalism, one unlike that of the United States or Western European societies: based not on an acceptance of pluralistic life choices, but on adherence to a single set of ideal life patterns, bisected by gender and ranked by age. \u00a0That alternative version of capitalism was highly effective for forty years, whatever its costs to individuals, creating the Japanese economic miracle. \u00a0However, it will not last much longer, we predict; the world, and its dominant variety of capitalism, cannot be kept at bay. \u00a0Sone\u2019s expatriates represent the Japanese recent past; but for better or for worse, it is her local hires who represent the Japanese future.<\/p>\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n

Befu, Harumi. \u00a02000. \u201cGlobalization as Human Dispersal: From the Perspective of Japan,\u201d in J. S. Eades, T. Gill, and H. Befu (eds.), Globalization and Social Change in Contemporary Japan. Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.<\/p>\n

Befu, Harumi. \u00a02001. \u00a0Heterogeneity of Homogeneity. \u00a0Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.<\/p>\n

Befu, Harumi, and Sylvie Guichard-Anguis (eds.), 2001. \u00a0Globalizing Japan: Ethnography of the Japanese Presence in Asian, Europe, and America. \u00a0London: Routledge.<\/p>\n

Ben-Ari, Eyal. 2003. \u00a0\u201cThe Japanese in Singapore: The Dynamics of an Expatriate Community.\u201d In R. Goodman, C. Peach, A. Takenaka, and P. White (eds.), Global Japan: The Experience of Japan\u2019s New Immigrant and Overseas Communities. \u00a0London: RoutledgeCurzon.<\/p>\n

Ben-Ari, Eyal, and Yong Yin Fong Vanessa. \u00a02000. \u00a0\u201cTwice-Marginalized: Single Japanese Female Expatriates in Singapore.\u201d \u00a0In E. Ben-Ari and J. Clammer (eds.), Japanese in Singapore: Cultural Occurrences and Cultural Flows. \u00a0Richmond, U.K.: Curzon.<\/p>\n

Douglass, Mike and Glenda S. Roberts. \u00a02000. \u00a0\u201cJapan in a Global Age of Migration.\u201d \u00a0In M. Douglass and G. Roberts (eds.), Japan and Global Migration: Foreign Workers and the Advent of a Multicultural Society. \u00a0London: Routledge.<\/p>\n

Fraser, Niall. \u00a02003. \u00a0\u201cExpat Population a Mystery.\u201d \u00a0Feb. 9. \u00a0South China Morning Post.<\/p>\n

Goodman, Roger. 2003. \u201cThe Changing Perception and Status of Japan\u2019s Returnee Children (kikokushijo). In R. Goodman, C. Peach, A. Takenaka, and P. White (eds.), Global Japan: The Experience of Japan\u2019s New Immigrant and Overseas Communities. \u00a0London: RoutledgeCurzon.<\/p>\n

Holzhausen, Arne. \u00a02000. \u00a0Japanese Employment Practices in Transition: Promotion Policy and Compensation Systems in the 1990s. \u00a0Social Science Japan Journal 3(2): 221-235.<\/p>\n

Iwao, Sumiko. \u00a01993. \u00a0The Japanese Woman: Traditional Image and Changing Reality. \u00a0New York: The Free Press.<\/p>\n

Komai, Hiroshi. \u00a02001. \u00a0Foreign Migrants in Contemporary Japan. \u00a0Translated by Jens Wilkinson. Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.<\/p>\n

Kotani, Satoshi. \u00a01998. \u00a0Wakamonotachi no henb\u014d: sedai o meguru shakaigakuteki monogatari \u00a0[Changing youth: a sociological narrative about the generations]. \u00a0Kyoto: Sekai shis\u014dsha.<\/p>\n

Langness, L. L. \u00a01987. \u00a0The Study of Culture. \u00a0Revised edition. \u00a0Novato, CA: Chandler & Sharp.<\/p>\n

Majima, S. 2002. Hataraku furiitaa otasuke gaido [A guide for working furiitaa]. Tokyo: Nihon Jitsugy\u014d Shuppansha.<\/p>\n

Mathews, Gordon. \u00a01996. \u00a0What Makes Life Worth Living? How Japanese and Americans Make Sense of Their Worlds. \u00a0Berkeley: University of California Press.<\/p>\n

Mathews, Gordon. \u00a02004. \u00a0\u201cSeeking a Career, Finding a Job: How Young People Enter and Resist the Japanese World of Work.\u201d In G. Mathews and B. White (eds.), Japan\u2019s Changing Generations: Are Young People Creating a New Society? \u00a0London: RoutledgeCurzon.<\/p>\n

Mathews, Gordon and Bruce White (eds.), 2004. Japan\u2019s Changing Generations: Are Young People Creating a New Society? \u00a0London: RoutledgeCurzon.<\/p>\n

Mori, Sunta. 2004. \u00a0\u201cWhat Happens When They Come Back: How Japanese Young People With Foreign University Degrees Experience the Japanese Workplace.\u201d \u00a0In G. Mathews and B. White (eds.), Japan\u2019s Changing Generations: Are Young People Creating a New Society? \u00a0London: RoutledgeCurzon.<\/p>\n

Nakano, Lynne. \u00a02004. \u00a0\u201cMothers and their Unmarried Daughters: An Intimate Look at Generational Change.\u201d In G. Mathews and B. White, eds., Japan\u2019s Changing Generations: Are Young People Creating a New Society? \u00a0London: RoutledgeCurzon.<\/p>\n

Ogasawara, Yuko. \u00a01998. \u00a0Office Ladies and Salaried Men: Power, Gender, and Work in Japanese Companies. \u00a0Berkeley: University of California Press.<\/p>\n

Sakai, Junko. \u00a02000. \u00a0Japanese Bankers in the City of London: Language, Culture, and Identity in the Japanese Diaspora. \u00a0London and New York: Routledge.<\/p>\n

Sakurai, Tetsuo. \u00a01997. \u00a0\u201c\u2018Mondai\u2019 toshite no wakamono\u201d [Youth as a \u2018problem\u2019]. \u00a0In Shakaigaku ga wakaru [Understanding Sociology]. \u00a0Pp. 118-122. \u00a0Aera Mook 12. \u00a0Tokyo: Asahi shinbunsha.<\/p>\n

Sone, Ayako. \u00a02002. \u201c\u2019Being Japanese\u2019\u201d in a Foreign Place: Cultural Identities of Japanese in Hong Kong.\u201d \u00a0M. Phil. Thesis, Dept. of Anthropology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.<\/p>\n

Tergeson, Anne. 1990. \u00a0\u201cHistorian Sees No End to City\u2019s Slide.\u201d \u00a0Japan Times. \u00a022 July.<\/p>\n

White, Merry. \u00a01988. \u00a0Japanese Overseas: Can They Go Home Again? \u00a0Princeton: Princeton University Press.<\/p>\n

Wong, Heung Wah. \u00a01999. \u00a0Japanese Bosses, Chinese Workers: Power and Control in a Hong Kong Megastore. \u00a0Richmond, U.K.: Curzon.<\/p>\n

Yamada, Masahiro. \u00a01999. \u00a0Parasaito shinguru no jidai [The age of parasite singles].<\/p>\n

Tokyo: Chikuma shob\u00f4.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ayako Sone and Gordon Mathews This article is based on research conducted by Ayako Sone in 2001-2002 on the cultural identities of Japanese in Hong Kong; but it places that research into a broader perspective. \u00a0We discuss the conflict between \u201cJapanese\u201d and \u201cnon-Japanese\u201d among Japanese in Hong Kong: the conflict between expatriates and local hires\u2014between, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":1427,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[74,68,85],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1128","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles","category-japan","category-issue-2"],"yoast_head":"\nExpatriate and \u2018Local Hire\u2019 Japanese in Hong Kong and the Struggle for the Soul of Japan - Global Ethnographic<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Expatriate and \u2018Local Hire\u2019 Japanese in Hong Kong and the Struggle for the Soul of Japan - Global Ethnographic\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ayako Sone and Gordon Mathews This article is based on research conducted by Ayako Sone in 2001-2002 on the cultural identities of Japanese in Hong Kong; but it places that research into a broader perspective. \u00a0We discuss the conflict between \u201cJapanese\u201d and \u201cnon-Japanese\u201d among Japanese in Hong Kong: the conflict between expatriates and local hires\u2014between, […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Global Ethnographic\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-05-31T06:49:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-20T14:48:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Fotolia_HongKong.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1688\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"960\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ayako Sone and Gordon Mathews\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ayako Sone and Gordon Mathews\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"35 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/\",\"name\":\"Expatriate and \u2018Local Hire\u2019 Japanese in Hong Kong and the Struggle for the Soul of Japan - Global Ethnographic\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Fotolia_HongKong.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-05-31T06:49:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-20T14:48:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/#\/schema\/person\/51c269dc815c6dbe0931bd291df33791\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Fotolia_HongKong.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Fotolia_HongKong.jpg\",\"width\":1688,\"height\":960,\"caption\":\"Hong Kong skyline. View from Victoria Peak.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Expatriate and \u2018Local Hire\u2019 Japanese in Hong Kong and the Struggle for the Soul of Japan\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/\",\"name\":\"Global Ethnographic\",\"description\":\"Journal for Ethnographic Research\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/#\/schema\/person\/51c269dc815c6dbe0931bd291df33791\",\"name\":\"Ayako Sone and Gordon Mathews\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/author\/ayako-sone-and-gordon-mathews\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Expatriate and \u2018Local Hire\u2019 Japanese in Hong Kong and the Struggle for the Soul of Japan - Global Ethnographic","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Expatriate and \u2018Local Hire\u2019 Japanese in Hong Kong and the Struggle for the Soul of Japan - Global Ethnographic","og_description":"Ayako Sone and Gordon Mathews This article is based on research conducted by Ayako Sone in 2001-2002 on the cultural identities of Japanese in Hong Kong; but it places that research into a broader perspective. \u00a0We discuss the conflict between \u201cJapanese\u201d and \u201cnon-Japanese\u201d among Japanese in Hong Kong: the conflict between expatriates and local hires\u2014between, […]","og_url":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/","og_site_name":"Global Ethnographic","article_published_time":"2014-05-31T06:49:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-20T14:48:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1688,"height":960,"url":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Fotolia_HongKong.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ayako Sone and Gordon Mathews","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ayako Sone and Gordon Mathews","Est. reading time":"35 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/","url":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/","name":"Expatriate and \u2018Local Hire\u2019 Japanese in Hong Kong and the Struggle for the Soul of Japan - Global Ethnographic","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Fotolia_HongKong.jpg","datePublished":"2014-05-31T06:49:36+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-20T14:48:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/#\/schema\/person\/51c269dc815c6dbe0931bd291df33791"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Fotolia_HongKong.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Fotolia_HongKong.jpg","width":1688,"height":960,"caption":"Hong Kong skyline. View from Victoria Peak."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/expatriate-and-local-hire-japanese-in-hong-kong-and-the-struggle-for-the-soul-of-japan\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Expatriate and \u2018Local Hire\u2019 Japanese in Hong Kong and the Struggle for the Soul of Japan"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/","name":"Global Ethnographic","description":"Journal for Ethnographic Research","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/#\/schema\/person\/51c269dc815c6dbe0931bd291df33791","name":"Ayako Sone and Gordon Mathews","url":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/author\/ayako-sone-and-gordon-mathews\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1128"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1128"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1128\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1153,"href":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1128\/revisions\/1153"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1427"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1128"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1128"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globalethnographic.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1128"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}